Featured Article

Central Monitoring Use in Early-Phase and Small Enrollment Trials

Central monitoring is highly effective in detecting emerging quality issues in clinical trials, but debate continues over its use in early-phase and small enrollment studies due to typically lower data volumes and shorter study timelines. In this analysis, we summarized industry trends in early-phase and small trials using data from the CluePoints central monitoring platform. Out of the 1,062 studies using the platform, 140 were Phase I (13%), 378 were Phase II (36%), and across all phases we observed 175 trials with 100 or fewer enrolled patients (16%) and 65 more with 50 or fewer enrolled patients (6%).

Guide

NEW: The Ultimate Guide to Modern, Regulatory-Grade RBQM

Blog
The Hidden Inspection Risk in Your Medical and Safety Review Workflow
Blog
Why Medical and Safety Review Is One of the Last Manual Workflows in Clinical Trials
Blog
Turning Oversight into Evidence: How to Prove Your Decisions at Any Point in a Trial